🔗 Share this article

Ex-President Donald Trump has consistently expressed his wish to see opponents investigated, exerting pressure on the DOJ to charge ex FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.

"We cannot postpone further, it's killing our reputation and credibility," the leader stated recently in a Truth Social post.

"They impeached twice, and charged me (5 times!)" he declared, referencing the multiple legal proceedings he faced after leaving the White House in 2021 and James's civil case.

Each have since been charged, in situations that numerous experts have said seem to be driven by politics and challenging to succeed in legal proceedings.

But the latest charges against a presidential opponent, former security advisor John Bolton, differ significantly, legal experts and former prosecutors say.

"In my opinion, comparing Bolton's case to Comey's is like equating two different things," stated Mark Lesko, a former federal prosecutor for the Eastern District of New York.

This Details of the Legal Situation

Bolton has been criminally indicted on federal charges related to the alleged mishandling of sensitive materials. After leaving the White House in 2019, he has emerged as a outspoken Trump critic, even to describe him "stunningly uninformed" and unsuitable for office in his memoir.

Specialists contend that while there may be political motivations to go after Bolton, the methods used to secure an charge and the evidence compiled against him indicate a possibly stronger case than the DOJ presented against Comey.

"These actions that's being alleged is simultaneously more severe and seems to have taken place over a significant duration," commented Carissa Byrne Hessick, a professor at the University of North Carolina School of Law.

Throughout his time as Trump's national security adviser, and following his 2019 White House departure, authorities alleged that Bolton put the country at danger by wrongfully retaining and sending classified information to family members using unprotected methods, including AOL. Several of the materials were labeled highly classified.

The indictment states that at a certain time a unauthorized user gained access to Bolton's account where files were stored and sent an apparent threat to cause "the largest scandal since Hillary [Clinton]'s emails were leaked".

Bolton pleaded not guilty during a court appearance on Friday to eighteen separate charges of improperly handling sensitive materials.

Political Motivation or a Strong Legal Argument?

The timing of his indictment - coming on the heels of charges against James - has renewed questions about external influence on the legal system.

Trump once implied Bolton belonged in prison, and called him a "disreputable person". Bolton, for his role, wrote a publication about his experience in the Trump administration that was highly critical of the president.

"There's no question that the timing of this charge, when paired with others, has prompted questions about the validity of these allegations, and why these counts are being brought at this time," said Jamil Jaffer, founder and director of the National Security Institute.

Nevertheless, he continued, "if the Justice Department is capable to demonstrate the allegations alleged and demonstrate the material is properly designated, his conduct may very well have broken the statute".

Prosecuting such a high-ranking official for mishandling classified documents is "uncommon" but not without precedent, said Carrie Cordero, a expert at the Center for a New American Security.

"Situations that concern classified information pose challenges to prosecute, but they may and are filed against both low-level and senior personnel, from occasionally," she said.

Parallels to Investigations into Trump and President

Trump likewise faced charges of improperly keeping sensitive materials at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida and hindering their recovery, but that matter was eventually dismissed by a court official and voided by his re-election as leader.

A special counsel additionally determined that former President Joe Biden improperly stored classified documents from his period as vice president, but did not criminally charge him.

Bolton's situation bears similarities to Trump's sensitive materials matters, noted Mr Lesko, who previously held a senior security role at the DOJ.

Strict procedures govern the handling of sensitive materials. To win a guilty verdict, the government must demonstrate that Bolton knew the information he was sending was classified, and he had to intentionally transmit it to someone without authorization to receive it.

"Due to the classified character of the information at issue in this matter, we don't have a great deal of particulars about the reasons the prosecution believes elements like the personal notes and the other material he communicated by email, and why there were classified," explained Mr Jaffer.

A Increasingly Traditional Prosecution

The process by which the DOJ initiated this case will be under scrutiny, after Trump openly expressed his wish to see his critics charged and some of those charges came to fruition.

But Mr Lesko indicated in Bolton's situation, prosecutors appear to have adhered to standard procedure.

"This Bolton case and eventually the charge appeared to have followed the regular procedure including the rules and norms within the DOJ," he stated.

Unlike Comey's short, two-page indictment, Bolton's was a increasingly "traditional" document that "clearly sets forth the details involving the circumstances and circumstances here," Mr Lesko said.

"It seems reasonably aligned with a long line of cases... where public servants improperly handled and shared classified material."